Ryan Nijboer vs Oleksii Krutykh Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Recent performances from Krutykh and Nijboer offer critical insights into predicting the outcome of their impending encounter. Analysis of their second serve performance over the past six months reveals that Krutykh has secured 43.68% of points on their second serve, compared to Nijboer's 43%. When examining return game statistics in the same period, Nijboer leads by recovering 48.51% of their opponent's second serve points, surpassing Krutykh's 46.06%. In terms of return on first serves, the margins are narrow, with Krutykh achieving a 29.14% success rate, slightly ahead of Nijboer’s 28.4%.

Assessing the players' ability to perform under pressure, Nijboer has demonstrated effectiveness by saving 52.02% of breakpoints faced, while Krutykh trails slightly, saving 50.65%. Breakpoint conversion has also been a notable strength for Nijboer, who has converted 38.36% of opportunities, outpacing Krutykh's 32.11%. Such statistics are essential for predicting outcomes, especially in live betting scenarios.

Krutykh's overall match success rate in the past year stands at 61.18%, while Nijboer has won 57.45% of matches he played. Krutykh's best surface historically has been clay, boasting a career win percentage of 61%, whereas his weakest has been grass with 33%. On the other hand, Nijboer excels on hard courts with a career win percentage of 59%, while he struggles on indoor hard courts with just 22% success. The players also differ in their recent opponents' average rankings, with Krutykh having faced players ranked 425.87 on average, whereas Nijboer's opponents were ranked slightly lower, at 449.54.

Considering head-to-head engagements, Krutykh and Nijboer have faced off twice, sharing victories with one win each. During these encounters, they each secured three sets apiece, highlighting their competitive parity. In their latest match at the Barcelona Challenger on clay, Krutykh emerged victorious with a scoreline of 6-2, 4-6, 6-1. The average duration of their matches has been around 2 hours and 22 minutes.

Direct competition details reveal mixed results in pressure situations, with only one tiebreak played between them, won by Nijboer. Krutykh’s performance in deciding sets stands at 50% over the last year, while Nijboer’s is slightly lower at 46%. Given the statistical overview and Krutykh's recent head-to-head win, combined with his clay surface advantage, Krutykh appears more likely to claim victory in their latest face-off.